Quantum Physics
Is it All a Coincidence? An Insight into the Quantum World
Albert Einstein wanted to explain the world as being causal. There should be a cause for every effect, even if we are not always able to recognize it. This is why he was entirely unsatisfied with the occurrence of coincidences in quantum physics, and remained so until the end of his days. His objection to this is often framed by the quote “God doesn’t play dice”; contemporary sources state that he actually phrased this in a much less polite manner. Niels Bohr, his great opponent in quantum physics, basically responded to Einstein by saying that he shouldn’t tell God how to run the world. Today, nearly 90 years after Einstein’s first protests, science is still convinced that randomness governs main areas of quantum physics.
Quantum physics only predicts the results of experiments and/or measurements in a statistical manner. Which of all possible results a single measurement yields is totally coincidental, cannot be traced back to an underlying cause and can therefore not be predicted for a single case. The mathematical tool for the statistical evaluations is the so-called wave function; the square of its absolute value determines the probability of a certain result. So much for background information, now let’s move on to a simple example which is actually of great practical relevance, as we will later see.
The light source in picture 1 emits unpolarized light, depicted as four double-headed arrows. The portion of the light whose oscillation plane is normal to the “bars of the grid” passes through the polarizer, the other portion is reflected or absorbed. After the 0° polarizer, the light travels on at half the original intensity and is vertically polarized, as symbolized by the vertical double-headed arrow. This light hits the second polarizer, which is turned by 45°. This light is then polarized by 45°, its intensity again being reduced by 50 %. If this second polarizer were turned by 90°, no light would pass through; if it were aligned with the first polarizer, all the remaining light would pass through, as Malus’ law tells us.
Now where does coincidence come in?
To recognize the random event here, let’s imagine an extremely weak light source that only emits single unpolarized photons. Now half of the photons go through the 0° polarizer; these photons are vertically polarized and hit the 45° polarizer. According to Malus’ law, half of the light that enters the 45° polarizer passes through. However, how can this be explained if we view light as particles? Since, as we know, photons are indivisible, no half-photons can pass through. So on average only every second photon can pass through the 45° polarizer in order to cut the light intensity down by one half. This is where coincidence comes in: Whether a certain photon passes through the polarizer or not is entirely coincidental and cannot be traced back to a certain cause. Averaged across many photons, exactly 50 % pass through.Every user of polarimeters, which are instruments for determining the optical activity of molecules, conducts the above described experiment – usually without knowing it. Many molecules come in the form of two enantiomers, as shown in picture 2. These molecule variants are like our hands, they mirror each other and can therefore not be superimposed in such a way that their shapes match. Enantiomers typically show the same chemical behavior but can have completely different biological effects. This is why it is extremely important, especially in the case of pharmaceutical ingredients, to be able to differentiate between such molecule variants. This is possible because these variants, brought into solution, rotate the oscillation plane of polarized light in different ways. To analyze this property, you need a polarimeter.
Picture source: http://bio1151.nicerweb.com/Locked/media/ch04/isomer-enantiomer.html

No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.